5 Stories That Shaped Fundraising This Week
The fundraising landscape shifted this week. Nonprofits are grappling with AI adoption gaps, athletic departments are watching donor dollars migrate to NIL collectives, and new data suggests the way donors find you online is changing faster than most realize.
Here are the five stories worth your attention.
1. The 92/7 Problem Has a Name Now
A new report from Virtuous and Fundraising.AI dropped some sobering numbers: 92% of nonprofits now use AI in their fundraising work, but only 7% report meaningful mission impact.
The culprit isn't the technology. It's implementation. Most teams have hit an "efficiency plateau"—doing the same things faster instead of fundamentally changing their capabilities. The fix isn't more tools. It's governance policies (which 47% lack), documented workflows, and shared approaches across teams.
What it means for you: Stop asking "are we using AI?" Start asking "are we building institutional knowledge around it?"
2. Boosters Are Skipping Athletic Departments Entirely
South Carolina's athletic directors made headlines this week pleading for NIL payment secrecy. But the bigger story buried in the coverage: booster giving patterns have fundamentally shifted.
Donors who once wrote checks to athletic departments are now funneling money directly to NIL collectives and player recruitment. The traditional fundraising relationship—AD cultivates donor, donor supports program—is being disintermediated by third-party organizations that promise more direct impact on roster building.
What it means for you: If you're in college athletics, your stewardship strategy needs to account for competing asks. Boosters have finite dollars. NIL collectives are now your competition, not your complement.
3. Google Search Won't Save You Anymore
The NonProfit Times published a sobering piece on how AI is transforming donor discovery. The old playbook—SEO, strong website, maybe some paid SEM—worked because donors searched and clicked through to your site.
Now? AI assistants are answering questions directly. Donors get information without ever visiting your website. The middleman (your carefully optimized landing page) is being cut out of the conversation.
What it means for you: Your digital strategy needs to evolve beyond "be findable" to "be referable." How are you showing up in AI-generated recommendations? Do you even know?
4. Texas Tech Donor's Letter Went Viral for a Reason
A frustrated Texas Tech booster penned an open letter calling out NIL's impact on competitive balance. The letter resonated because it named what many donors are feeling: the system they built their loyalty around no longer exists.
NIL was supposed to let athletes monetize their marketability. Instead, it's become a recruitment arms race where wealthy programs with deep booster networks buy advantages that mid-majors can't match.
What it means for you: Donor fatigue is real. If your supporters feel like their contributions are drops in an ocean competing against oil wells, you need to reconnect them with tangible, visible impact. Small wins they can see beat abstract competitiveness arguments.
5. AI Grants Are Available (But There's a Catch)
GrantedAI published a helpful guide on AI funding for nonprofits this week. The good news: foundations and government programs are increasingly earmarking money for technology adoption. The catch: most nonprofits are still running donor management on decade-old spreadsheets.
The organizations landing these grants aren't the ones with the best AI ideas. They're the ones who can articulate specific, measurable use cases and demonstrate they've done the foundational work to implement responsibly.
What it means for you: Before you apply for AI funding, get your data house in order. Grants go to organizations with implementation plans, not wish lists.
The Week Ahead
March brings conference season. Virtuous is hosting their summit March 11-12. Outcomes Conference celebrates 50 years. And the NCAA's settlement payments kick off a new era of revenue-sharing chaos.
If you're leading donor relationships in this environment, the consistent thread across all five stories is the same: the rules changed. Strategies that worked in 2024 are already showing their age. The organizations thriving in 2026 are the ones adapting fastest.
Navigating the disruption?
We're building tools at DonorElevate to help teams make personalized stewardship scalable—not by adding complexity, but by working smarter.
See How It WorksSources: Virtuous/Fundraising.AI 2026 Report, NonProfit Times, News From The States, GrantedAI
%202.png)